Myotherapy
HomeFeaturedAboutResearchBlogContact
Find Listing
Myotherapy
01Home02Featured03About04Research05Blog06ContactFind Listing
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Research
  4. /
  5. Cupping Therapy Vs Foam Rolling For Hamstring Pathology

Get in touch

Email
[email protected]
Address
154 Peel Street, North Melbourne VIC 3051, Australia

Follow Us

Ready to feel like yourself again?

Find Listing
Myotherapy
[email protected]

For Patients

  • Find a Myotherapist
  • Remedial Massage
  • Dry Needling
  • Read Reviews

For Practitioners

  • List Your Practice
  • How It Works
  • Pricing
  • Clinic Listings

Company

  • Research Behind Myotherapy
  • Blog
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service

Stay in the loop

Myotherapy sends one roundup a month. Add a note when a new guide or research summary goes up, and nothing else arrives.

© Myotherapy. All rights reserved. ABN 29 790 082 072Built with care in Melbourne, Australia
Research summaryCupping TherapyFor patients

Cupping Therapy vs Foam Rolling for Hamstring PathologyWhat a Randomised Controlled Trial Found

A single session of cupping with active movement improved hamstring flexibility more than foam rolling — and athletes preferred it.

Written by
MyoFitness Research Team
Published
13 September 2026
Reading time
5 min read
Practitioner applying glass cups to a patient's back
Year
2020
Journal
International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy
Study design
Pilot randomised controlled trial
Lead author
Warren AJ et al.
Full study details

Acute Outcomes of Myofascial Decompression (Cupping Therapy) Compared to Self-Myofascial Release on Hamstring Pathology After a Single Treatment

Authors
Warren AJ, LaCross Z, Volberding JL, O'Brien MS
Published in
International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy, 2020
Volume · Issue · Pages
Vol. 15 · Issue 4 · p. 579-592
DOI
10.26603/ijspt20200579
Study design
Pilot randomised controlled trial
Read the full paper
On this page
  1. 01What the study looked at
  2. 02What each treatment involved
  3. 03What the results showed
  4. ·Key finding in plain terms
  5. 04What this means for practice
  6. 05Limitations to be aware of
  7. 06Summary
  8. ·Full research paper
01

What the study looked at

This pilot randomised controlled trial compared two widely used soft tissue interventions applied to collegiate athletes who had been diagnosed with hamstring pathology: myofascial decompression (MFD), commonly known as cupping therapy, and self-myofascial release (SMR) using a foam roller combined with moist heat.

Seventeen collegiate athletes (13 male, 4 female, average age 20.6 years) with confirmed hamstring pathology were randomly allocated to one of two groups. The study was designed to examine what happens immediately after a single treatment session. Both interventions were delivered once only, and outcomes were measured directly after treatment.

Why this matters to practitioners

Hamstring tightness, restriction, and pathology are among the most common presentations in myotherapy, physiotherapy, and remedial massage clinics. Understanding which soft tissue techniques produce the greatest short-term change in flexibility and patient-rated outcomes informs clinical decision-making and treatment planning.

02

What each treatment involved

  1. i

    Myofascial Decompression (Cupping Therapy)

    The MFD group received cupping therapy using plastic cups applied with a pump to create a vacuum on the hamstring musculature. Cups were applied for 5 minutes. Importantly, active mobilisation was performed during the cupping by having participants perform knee flexion and extension movements while the cups were in place. This is the key clinical distinction from static cupping, combining negative pressure tissue decompression with active movement to achieve greater fascial and neuromuscular effect.

  2. ii

    Self-Myofascial Release (Foam Rolling)

    The SMR group received a moist heat pack followed by 5 minutes of foam rolling on the hamstring musculature. Participants rolled their bodyweight over a dense foam cylinder in a self-directed manner to mobilise the posterior thigh soft tissues. Foam rolling is one of the most commonly prescribed home care and warm-up techniques in sports rehabilitation and gym-based programs.

03

What the results showed

Both treatments produced improvements in hamstring flexibility and patient-rated outcomes. However, the cupping therapy group demonstrated greater improvements across the key measures, and the difference in how patients felt about the treatment was statistically significant.

  1. 01

    Active Range of Motion

    The cupping group showed greater improvements in active hamstring range of motion after a single session, supporting its use where immediate gains in posterior chain mobility are the treatment goal.

  2. 02

    Patient-Rated Outcomes

    A statistically significant difference in Global Rating of Change (GROC) values favoured the cupping group. Participants felt cupping produced a greater and more noticeable treatment effect than foam rolling.

  3. 03

    Perceived Benefit

    Participants in the MFD group reported an enhanced treatment effect for perceived hamstring flexibility. This subjective experience of benefit matters clinically, as therapeutic alliance and patient confidence in a technique influence adherence and outcomes.

  4. 04

    Safety Profile

    No adverse effects were reported in either group. Cupping therapy was well tolerated by all participants, consistent with its established safety profile when applied by a trained practitioner.

“

Key finding in plain terms

A single session of cupping therapy produced greater improvements in hamstring flexibility and a better patient experience than a single session of foam rolling. Both interventions were safe. Patients found cupping more effective and preferred it.

04

What this means for practice

Hamstring pathology, posterior chain restriction, and reduced hip flexion range of motion are everyday presentations in myotherapy, physiotherapy, and remedial massage clinics. They appear across almost every patient population: runners and cyclists, desk workers with shortened hip flexors, gym-goers with overloaded posterior chains, people recovering from hamstring strains, and older clients managing cumulative movement restriction.

This study adds to the evidence base for myofascial decompression as a clinical intervention, not just a complementary technique, and has specific implications for how practitioners in these disciplines approach soft tissue treatment.

Clinical relevance by discipline

  • Myotherapy

    01

    Cupping (MFD) is within the scope of a myotherapist's clinical toolkit. This study supports its use as a first-line or adjunct intervention for hamstring pathology, producing acute flexibility gains that complement trigger point therapy, dry needling, and manual muscle release within the same session.

  • Remedial Massage

    02

    Foam rolling is frequently prescribed as home care between remedial massage appointments. This research suggests cupping therapy in-clinic may produce superior short-term flexibility outcomes compared to foam rolling alone, giving remedial massage therapists trained in cupping a meaningful clinical advantage in managing posterior chain presentations.

  • Physiotherapy

    03

    MFD with active mobilisation aligns with physiotherapy principles of combining manual techniques with movement. The active knee flexion and extension performed during cupping in this study mirrors how physiotherapists use movement-based approaches alongside soft tissue work, and supports integrating cupping into rehabilitation protocols for hamstring pathology and lower limb mobility restoration.

  • Sports Treatment

    04

    For athletes where hamstring flexibility and posterior chain function directly affect performance and injury risk, this study supports the use of cupping as an efficient single-session intervention. The immediate gains in active range of motion are particularly relevant in the context of pre-competition preparation, between training sessions, or in early-phase injury management.

05

Limitations to be aware of

The study is a pilot randomised controlled trial with a small sample (17 participants), which limits the generalisability of the findings and statistical power. The participants were collegiate athletes with diagnosed hamstring pathology, so the results may not translate directly to sedentary populations, older adults, or those with different injury profiles. The study measured acute (immediate post-treatment) outcomes only, so nothing can be concluded about sustained or long-term effects from a single session. Larger trials with follow-up measures are needed to extend these findings.

These limitations do not diminish the clinical relevance of the findings, but they are important context when applying this research in practice. The study adds weight to what many practitioners already observe clinically: cupping produces meaningful, immediate changes in soft tissue mobility that patients notice and value.

06

Summary

This randomised controlled trial provides evidence that a single session of myofascial decompression (cupping therapy) with active mobilisation produces greater acute improvements in hamstring flexibility and a better patient-rated treatment experience than a single session of moist heat and foam rolling in collegiate athletes with hamstring pathology. The technique was safe, well tolerated, and preferred by participants.

For myotherapists, physiotherapists, and remedial massage therapists managing hamstring pathology, posterior chain restriction, or lower limb mobility deficits, this study supports cupping therapy as a clinically effective, evidence-backed intervention worth including in treatment where it is within scope and clinically indicated.

Full research paper

This page is a plain-language summary. The original paper holds the full methods, statistics and discussion.

Warren AJ, LaCross Z, Volberding JL, O'Brien MS (2020). Acute Outcomes of Myofascial Decompression (Cupping Therapy) Compared to Self-Myofascial Release on Hamstring Pathology After a Single Treatment. International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy, 15(4), 579-592.

DOI10.26603/ijspt20200579

Read the full paper
Put the evidence to work

Cupping therapy is available at MyoFitness.

Find a qualified myotherapist or remedial massage therapist who works from the research, or write to us with a question about this study.

Find a practitioner[email protected]
Keep reading

More research summaries

All research
  • 2012Cupping TherapyRandomised controlled exploratory trial (40 people with knee osteoarthritis)BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine
    For patientsCupping Therapy

    Can Cupping Ease Knee Osteoarthritis? What a Randomised Trial Found

    A four-week course of dry cupping eased knee pain and stiffness in people with osteoarthritis, compared with a waiting list.

    BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine · 2012
  • 2024Dry NeedlingRandomised controlled trial (people with tension-type headache and active trigger points)Journal of Personalized Medicine
    For patientsDry Needling

    Can Dry Needling Switch Off Trigger Points? What a 2024 Trial Found

    In people with tension-type headache, dry needling eased headache intensity and cut the number of active trigger points.

    Journal of Personalized Medicine · 2024
  • 2023Persistent PainSystematic review of 15 randomised controlled trialsInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
    For practitionersPersistent Pain

    Can Understanding Pain Reduce It? What the Research on Pain Science Education Found

    Across 15 trials, teaching people how pain works reduced pain, disability and fear — most of all alongside hands-on care and exercise.

    International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · 2023
Find ListingLogin